because my brain does not stop for football, here i am, asking a question that NO DOUBT may go relatively unanswered. sometimes i wonder about the earth dwellers but still, here i am; still, here we are. i'll make it brief:
Dear Religion:
Is every word of your various texts, full of and/or subject to subtext or is a word simply a word with nothing or no real meaning behind it?
As a Theist - more so, as a Theist Poet - sometimes i think about concepts and thought processes; words behind words. And let's face it, a sermon would not be a sermon if one didn't read and extrapolate a deep [inspired?] meaning from the text. But sometimes, is a word not.... i don't know... JUST a word. A footnote for historical reference rather than spiritual?
Here's one: Isaiah Chapter Six begins with, "In the year that King Uzziah died, I saw the Lord..."; it then goes into a beauuuutiful vision the prophet had of The Lord and the Seraphs and such. Life changing indeed. But for years, we have been fixated on the opening line: "In the year that King Uzziah died..."; we have asked ourselves (through various teachers, preachers... people) who is the "King Uzziah" in our lives? Who/what is stopping us from seeing God fully? It's as if the first five chapters of Isaiah mean.... i guess, close to nothing.
What if, King Uzziah was JUST a historical footnote? A timestamp of sorts. Quite like my mother saying, "In the year that Prime Minister Eric Williams died, Tracy was born." - a time stamp to mark what happened in the year. And IF it is, just a historical ref, does that mean that there are words in all the sacred texts (across the religious divide) that have AB-SOL-UTELY ZERO spiritual subtext? That it's just there to ground the story, the time? Please advise. Better yet, please advise your people. ... Well, my people.
k. thx. bye.
Comments
Post a Comment